You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #19: Yes and no.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
GTurck Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes and no..
The Founders were very suspicious of empire but knowing the Roman model so well they saw the dangers there too. Their idea was to not have a class of men who were expected to be senators with revolving tribunes, etc as leaders but for there to be a way for the best of all Americans no matter where they started from to have a chance to be in offices of power. That is a stand out difference from Rome. In Rome to become a senator you had to be a member of the Senatorial Class which was a sub-set of the Patricians. That was maybe 5% of 20% of all Romans. Over time it became possible to buy your seat in the Senate by being super-rich but there were never any elections by the people for this office. It would have been unthinkable to have judgment passed on those Senators-to-be by having plebeians vote for them. Now translate that all into today's terms and it will be easier to understand what a profound difference the founders of our nation intended.
But I am sorry for not having provided more of the quotes from "The Anti-Federalist Papers". I was trying to be brief.
p.6:"This republicanism of the 1780's was not in principle different from what in Britain and America by mid-nineteenth century was generally called representative democracy. The founders would not have been opposed to the modern connotation of the word "democracy," nor would they have used the word "republic" to mark out a distinction from those connotations. In scorning "democracy," eighteenth century theorists had in mind Aristotle's picture of a heedless, emotional, manipulated populace that would still be denigrated by most modern democratic theorists."
Thanks for the comments. It think it is essential that this sort of conversation is engaged.
Thanks to Ralph Ketcham who wrote the quote above for helping me understand our founding better too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC