You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Nancy Pelosi Is An Accomplice" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 03:45 AM
Original message
"Nancy Pelosi Is An Accomplice"
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 03:47 AM by orleans
randi had jonathan turley on her show again monday. the interview begins about 35 minutes into the show. (monday december 10, 2007)

download it from www.whiterosesociety.org
http://www.whiterosesociety.org/Rhodes.html

Randi: let’s go back to what you once told me; I think it was a week or two ago where you told me that you believe there was some sort of unwritten sort-of-a handshake/wink/nod between the republicans and the democrats when it comes to impeachment of this president.

Turley: there’s no question about it--it’s well understood on capitol hill that nancy pelosi and others have assured that the president will not be subject to impeachment and that’s one of the reasons why they’ve been avoiding confirmation of crimes: the two most obvious being domestic surveillance (without a warrant) and torture. If either of those facts are confirmed it would trigger a series of events and it would require them to do exactly what they promised they wouldn’t do--which is to look at impeachment. But it would also, as we know now, embarrass many democrats who were aware of this stuff. One of the interesting things about this administration is how skillful they are because if you look at electronic surveillance and torture--both of those cases clearly are criminal. But once they started, anybody with a J.D. could see that they were about to do something criminal. So what did the bush administration do? They brought in democrats and essentially co-opted them by giving them information. So when they revealed to these people that they were torturing people they did it in 2002 when they knew that no democrats wanted to look weak on terrorism. But as time went on, those same democrats could no longer come forward because they would have to explain why they waited so long. It’s a brilliant move.

(randi recaps, jonathan recaps and adds more)

Randi: nancy pelosi is an accomplice, unfortunately john Rockefeller is an accomplice, bob graham is an accomplice, jane harmon is an accomplice, porter goss is an accomplice, senator pat Roberts from Kansas--they have just become criminal accomplices to the crimes of the president. Which are war crimes. They’re big crimes.

Turley: we have a clear base for alleged crimes. In the normal case this would go very swiftly to a grand jury. But these democrats, as you’ll know--with the exception of joe biden--have all called for a justice department investigation.

Randi: yeah, the justice department should investigate the cia because that always works out well.

Turley: you’ve got two things with the justice department: they’ll adopt the most narrow possible view of their own conduct and they will move at a glacial pace. It’s absolutely bizarre to think that the justice department should review a case in which high ranking officials ranging from the cia to the white house and including possibly the justice department itself could be indicted. If this isn’t the case for an independent or special council then I don’t know what is.

(more back and forth)

Turley: …something is fundamentally wrong (not just in our system but in our culture) when our leaders commit heinous crimes and then conceal them in joint agreements from the people they represent

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC