Reply #62: I'm not exactly sure what the argument is, then

[Atman]

Your alternate sub line certainly would have made my point better, but I don't expect that's why you made your op. I understand that she is getting press all over the place, which in and of itself should be a US news story, but no one in the US media is touching it. So Ellsworth may be absolutely correct about the importance of Edmonds' statements and revelation, but what is the point as long as we have a lap dog media keeping the public intentionally uninformed.

DUers once again line up to post bouncies about "Yeah Daniel!" and "You go Sibel!" but it's meaningless. The only way politicians will respond is if there is some sort of public revelation and subsequent outcry. Since the media is making sure the public will never hear about Sibel Edmonds, there will be no outcry, and this will be just one more BushCo crime which will go down the memory hole. Or worse, after Hillary Clinton is installed to take over the Bush throne. Then the information will be locked away forever.

.