You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #164: Nah [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
anaxarchos Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #92
"It is quite a leap of rhetoric to turn Robbins into a sycophant of Bhm-Bawerk's, merely from the fact that the latter was one of several economists who influenced Robbins. For what it is worth, economists are still influenced by Walras and Pareto."

In fact Robbins appointed Hayek because of the LSE's intramural contest with Cambridge. Not only did Cambridge have all the good Marshallites but they had Keynes. The one skill the "Austrians" always claimed for themselves was a ruthless polemical style. That is what had originally given some little prominence to the flea and to Menger (in their debate with the Germans at the turn of the century). Hayek started out as a shill in this "tradition".

So how did Hayek do? Not so well judging by the fact that Robbins himself became something of a Keynesian. More, one of the biggest influences on Robbins was Frank Knight, the head of the first Chicago School of Economics. It is an open secret that Knight blocked Hayek from getting a paid faculty position at the University of Chicago. Its not a good omen when even your own guys wont give you a job.

Yes, I am aware of the retroactive praise that the Libertarian press heaps on Hayek in London. Amazing what a few billion dollars do for favorable reviews, post festum, isnt it? But, accept a small challenge from me: the original scholarly reviews of Hayeks Road to Serfdom are in large part available on the web. Find a single one that is favorable and was not written by a fellow-traveler or by Hayeks mother.

Yes, I think they were all hacks. But even if they werent, it wouldnt matter to the article. Then, Volker would have found some smart people to use to make-up an ideology. You travel very far a field, to prop up the Austrians (Im not even going to mention Spencer). Walras and Pareto? I kinda agree about Pareto but Walras is entirely another kettle of fish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC