You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #63: More interested in how many people are reading what he said. These post [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. More interested in how many people are reading what he said. These post
indicate that there is little concern with the substance of the discussions by DM.

For example, in Cannonfire's More on the Mystery Poster, there are a few points that merit discussion, moreso certainly than speculations about the inner mental machinations of possible whistleblowers and leakers (however interesting such psychological topics may be).

This is a short list compared to the many topics in all the posts:

* Verizon was allowing the NSA to listen in on private telephone calls and emails

* Verizon responded they could not confirm or deny ...

* Drew C. Arena is the "Vice President and Associate General Counsel Law Enforcement and national Security Compliance, Verizon."

* There is an overlap between the WH, RNC, Verizon, DoJ on the FISA through the AMDCOS-intermediary link within the Verizon e-mail.

* AMDCOS, an Israeli telecommunications company in St. Louis, MO, is a DoJ contractor accused of spying DoJ and telephone and credit card records of U.S. intelligence operatives.

* Fleishman Hilliard may have stripped down versions of the NSA intercept data.

* Gonzales' "this program" or "that program" relate to NSA data stripped of identifying information, transferred to a firm associated with DoJ and DoD.

* What is the explanation for the discrepancy between Mueller's and Gonzales' description of the surveillance programs.

AND, I sure would appreciate avoiding a flame war or even discussing why we are not discussing such and such. I'm trying to reclaim the OP focus, what is being said by Deep Modem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC