Reply #322: Hold On There, Earl

[ProfessorGAC]

You must be kidding. You're basing that conclusion over this limited data set and time? Well you made this decision on what was an awfully small dataset, so perhaps that's your way.

You are doing backflips to justify this decision to employ this iatotropic cure. The problem was not profound enough to apply this strong a "solution". The admins have to be able to look into a mirror and admit that you were fished in by a small, vocal minority of whiners.

There are dozens, no hundreds, of LONG time posters with stars after their names for YEARS who loathe this new idea. That, in an of itself, constitutes a FAR greater dataset than that upon which you have rejected the circle jerk theory. So, which is it? Can we draw conclusions on limited information but not on even bigger sets of it? If a little info is enough, more should be better.

Last point: With the consternation this "experiment" has caused, and the continual attempts to rationalize it, i reminded of someone else who doesn't much care what the people think. He's a pretty unpopular guy on DU. After all, this is DEMOCRATIC underground, is it not?
GAC