You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #47: He could have chosen to back up Kerry's attacks on Bush's decisions and there is nothing untoward
[View All]
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-29-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 47. He could have chosen to back up Kerry's attacks on Bush's decisions and there is nothing untoward |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-29-07 02:03 PM by blm
for a Dem president siding with a Dem nominee is there? In fact - it should be EXPECTED.
The American people were buying what Kerry was saying - why did Bill have to give more public support to Bush on decisions the Dem Nominee was attacking while putting forth his own plans and positions?
If Clinton was sincere, then why did he not side with Kerry's view of Bush's Iraq decisions in any public way IF they matched his own views at the time as he now claims?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread