You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: Who is to say.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
TAZller Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Who is to say....
that the husband had any more control of this woman than the police did whom felt it necessary to handcuff and shackle her after missing a flight. It is highly presumptive (and clearly indicating you've never seen a loved one at their bottom) in assuming this was a trip that could be made with the husband along. Often prior to getting help addicts will push friends and family so far away that all they can do is watch them either spiral out of control or hope they help themselves. It is conceivable that she demanded to make this trip alone and on her own tems. She could have flipped out and never given him the opportunity to join her.... What do you suggest...the husband tie her up and drag her by her hair into treatment. He was likely very worried about her, but even a husband can only do so much in the face of irrationality. To blame him is akin to blaming a drug addicts family for allowing one to commit suicide. At some point personal responsibility of the addict must be exercised to its own end.

But the point is she died when she was rendered helpless while she was already in a diminished capacity. Even if she was not out of control and had merely died by passing out and choking on her own vomit... the police would, should, and I believe will be held negligent in the responibility they took upon themselves when they placed her in their custody. She was no longer in her own custody by police action and I would hate to live in a police state where this responsibility is routinely ignored and not litigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC