You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #63: I've been reading [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Vyan Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. I've been reading
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 06:33 AM by Vyan
John Dean and others, and what they say makes a ton of sense to me.

Regarding the idea that I need you to do "homework" for you, I think you are confused. And if you want to assume I am incapable of answering your question, you would have to believe that the book by a retired federal prosecutor doesn't exist -- but it does.


I never said it didn't exist. You said my claims are wrong, but you provided no specifics, no examples, no geniune argument - just ridicule. I've provided numerous links to detailed specifics on what I'm saying.

Besides your snide attitude, my reluctance is also financial - I'm self employed and don't have disposable cash to go running out and buying every book mentioned by someone who clearly already has a copy but won't bother backing up their claims with even a single quote which would otherwise quickly clear this discussion up.

The opinion that you have expressed is simply wrong.


Which one, that there isn't law against being wrong? Or lying to the public? Or was it that Congress can somehow breach Grand Jury Secrecy Rules?

If you are interested in learning more, you have the option of reading de la Vega's book, which I recommend.


Which is in my case, is much like saying I have the "option" of having this 2-inch lump on my leg removed anytime I like - except that I don't have health insurance so it's no option at all. Thanks.

But that's your responsibility, not mine. There are a number of anti-impeachment folks on this forum, who raise the same incorrect "opinions," misinformation, and nonsense on the impeachment threads, and I have no interest in debating the same foolishness week after week.


Apparently not, in which case why should anyone have any interest in your - rather rudely presented - assertions? Sorry but insulting people is not persuasive, and that's really a shame since I've been on the Pro-Impeachment Bandwagon for far longer than most and this stridency is more likely to drive supporters away than help convince the reluctant.

Vyan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC