You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Will Congress' do a new AUMF for Iran or will they use the Sept 2001 AUMF [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Will Congress' do a new AUMF for Iran or will they use the Sept 2001 AUMF
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 01:10 PM by EVDebs
re terror and "...as he determines..." meaning Bush has extra-Consitutional powers which Congress has abdicated ?

Sept 2001 AUMF
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/sept_11/sjres23_eb.htm

""SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

(b) War Powers Resolution Requirements-

(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.""


The (as) 'he determines' language is the scariest part of this, yet the WPA of '73

http://www.policyalmanac.org/world/archive/war_powers_resolution.shtml

embedded requires "CLEAR" (truthful) "SITUATIONS" and "CIRCUMSTANCES" in order to proceed (see section c, below); the lack of clarity in the entire Iran situation now reveals the flawed logic Congress has used to further enable this administration. It's time Congress stand up and think for itself. Sen Warner seems to be learning this as he's mentions 'revisiting' the Iraq AUMF from Oct 2002. This one from Sept 2001 needs revisiting too,

""(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.""


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC