You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Yes... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yes...
and you're right, it does suck all around.

I read a special issue of Money magazine, on Real estate investing. It was primarily a big, slick ad for people going deeper in debt. The magazine refused to endorse the logic in the inevitable--what goes up, must come down.

They profiled a specific area in CA--San Diego to be exact and I was absolutely stunned by the article. Most notably, a 24 year old young woman with a colleg loan debt and no savings. She bought a $580,000 4 bedroom, two bath home. It's near the airport runway, so planes taking off rattles the windows.

Get this, she took out a mortgage for 100% of the price of the home. Closing costs were paid by a $10,000 gift from her parents. At the time of the article, she was paying the majority of the mortgage by renting out three of the four bedrooms. Because a house across the street from her sold for $740,000 she figured her place was already worth $200,000 more than she paid for it. :eyes:

Her plan at the time of the interview was to borrow more asap, to invest in a condo.:wow:

The article goes on to detail people that intially lucked into making a huge profit on their first homes, only to trade up, sell and make more. Then many had a hard time buying into homes bigger than they could afford. The gradual progression from being lucky to being greedy struck me. The article ended with a couple with an empty open house, for a home they were listing for 1.3 million. The week prior, there were 40 people at the open house. They eventually got an offer of 1.2. Others in the neighborhood were concerned that they shouldn't take less than 1.25 million as it would affect them all--as most living on that block, did so as propectors and for the investment. :shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC