Reply #49: Yes, I believe that you are wrong

[Time for change]

You say that you don't believe that 2.6 million votes for Bush could have been the result of election fraud. Why not? Why is it hard to imagine that with large portions of our elections computerized, and with the software code that counts our votes under the control of corporations with heavy ties to the Republican Party, and who demand that their software code be kept secret, that 2.6 million votes could have been stolen?

If you look at my OP you'll see that for each type of election fraud that I discuss I note the evidence as it applied to the 2004 election. And almost all of that is from Ohio alone, which I studied a lot closer than I did any other state, since Ohio is where Bush "won" his electoral college victory.

So if you disagree with any of the evidence that I supplied in this post, please tell me what part and why you disagree with it.