Reply #36: This is an important position to establish and revisit

[msgadget]

because she is genuinely polarizing and after reading about her '08 war chest I've been wondering what she and Bill are thinking to risk the presidential election at such a critical time in our nation's history. I have absolutely nothing against her (okay, for the sake of argument I don't) but anyone fervently interested in returning the WH to the democrats has gotta wonder how she's going to pull it off without Diebold.

It doesn't matter if you like, love, dislike or loathe the woman because if we're all here to figure out how to shift the country from one party rule we've got to be realistic even when a toxic candidate is repeatedly forced upon us. I will not support her because if she had MY best interests in mind, she'd use her powerful fundraising ability to help the party win in '06 AND the big one in '08. And, considering how much attention she gets when she speaks, she'd be heaping praise on her struggling party members and the likely '08 candidates. Just for giggles she'd refer to her 'colleagues' from HER side of the aisle more often than the other. No, instead she's runnin', by George (and Bill), she's runnin' because...because...?

Besides which, isn't the country sick of two names for the last 5 elections - Bush, Clinton, Bush, and then Clinton again? Er...no. Is this a tag team thing? Is there a joke we're not in on?