Reply #49: I'd vote for the guy.

[Usrename]

He doesn't appear to be allergic to the truth. Why do you insist on criticizing Hillary for other things instead of this? I don't really understand the purpose in those kind of statements. It is like you are asking us to evaluate her on just part of her history, like her support for the war. What is wrong with trying to get a more complete picture? Are you afraid you won't like the picture if you look too close?

Just wondering about that. I'd vote for the guy just because I like the ISSUE. It is an ISSUE that dems should be talking about at a deeper level than "Uh.. I don't remember, that was then, this is now, it's not important, and I have nothing to add to the debate." That's just lame politiking, hoping the ISSUE will go away, which is much more instructive, IMHO, than anything she may or may not have done in the past. I prefer people who stay close to a kicking horse, regardless of whether I agree with their political bent or not.