You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Bogus poll [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bogus poll
Not many people seem to remember that the IWR wasn't a vote for the invasion, but was a vote to give Bush authority to invade AFTER he had exhausted all legal channels to bring Hussein into compliance. There were a lot of different reasons for this bill, and each senator had to decide their own justification for the bill. Before the bill passed, Bush was claiming he had full authority without consulting COngress or going to the UN. For some the bill was an attempt to limit Bush's power, for some it was an attempt to avert the invasion that we all knew Bush wanted, and for some it was a vote to go to war.

I respect those who voted against it much more than those who voted for it, but one has to understand that many people voted for this bill because in their minds it was the last chance to avert an invasion, not an authorization of the invasion. Bush was claiming he could invade without the bill. The IWR put restrictions on what Bush claimed he could do.

Contrast Hillary, for instance, whose speech before voting for the bill emphasized her hope that this would lead to peace, not war (very similar to the speech Wesley Clark gave before the Armed Services Committee recommending such a bill), to those on the Republican side who saw this bill as a chance to invade.

So, to answer your poll question, I judge each politician on their complete record twoards the invasion. The IWR was one part of that. I respect those who voted against it more than those who voted for it. But some saw the bill as a chance to avert the war, and said so at the time. They were fooled by Bush, so they stand lower in my opinion than those who voted against the Resolution. But they still stand higher than those who aggressively campaigned for the invasion, and how aggressively championed it after it happened.

ANd I respect those who have turned against it more than those who still support it.

Politics is a lousy place for absolutism. Absolutists on either side frighten me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC