You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #93: heard same thing 'bout female/male condoms. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #61
93. heard same thing 'bout female/male condoms.
what my health professor said was it was more of a condition of slippage. female condoms are pretty large and tend to have a significant portion that protrudes from/overlaps the vulva area. whereas male condoms, why they can be used improperly as well just as anything, tend to have a more snug fit and less of a chance of slippage which could occasion riskier contact. but it really is more of an issue for raucous, hanging from the rafters, repeated full penetration/full withdrawal sex. sort of logical if you think about the mechanics of it. if it was a comment about female/male condoms outside of that difference though, i wouldn't know.

oh, last difference. unless there's a brand i don't know about, (almost?) all female condoms are polyurethane. since most studies about STD transmission has been on latex there's some lingering questions about polyurethane. note how in this article:

(in reference to male polyurethane condoms)
Polyurethane condoms have not been studied for their effectiveness in the prevention of STD transmission.3

(in reference to female condoms)
Laboratory studies have shown Reality® to be an effective barrier to microorganisms including HIV and including a bacteriophage smaller than hepatitis B, the smallest virus known to cause an STD.

(website)
http://www.siecus.org/pubs/fact/fact0011.html

so polyurethane *should* be as effective. yet within the same article there's still open questions. that's the only other possible case i can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC