You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proposed rule making it harder for companies to be indicted by the gov't or sued by the the public [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:26 PM
Original message
Proposed rule making it harder for companies to be indicted by the gov't or sued by the the public
Advertisements [?]
They are serious about this.

the government should be hesitant to ever indict companies, given possible damage to innocent shareholders and to the economy, and it said the law should be changed to give Washington the power to block state indictments of accounting or financial firms.

It added that if a state wanted to bring charges against either an auditing firm or a financial firm, the Justice Department should be able to block the prosecution “on the grounds of national interest.”


It also urges the commission to provide protection from lawsuits for directors who rely in good faith on auditors or on corporate officials.


And it suggests Congress consider limiting the liability of accounting firms, to protect them from collapse if they lose a major case.



and much more
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/business/30regs.html?_r=3&adxnnl=0&oref=slogin&ref=business&adxnnlx=1164901341-6BvozYN9Y3a01YwzYgxRag&pagewanted=print

Who are these people? Well



The report was produced by the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, a group co-chaired by R. Glenn Hubbard, the dean of the Columbia University Graduate School of Business, and John L. Thornton, the chairman of the Brookings Institution.

The committee has no official standing, but the identities of its leaders and its formation with an endorsement from Mr. Paulson have created an expectation that it may map out the Bush administration’s final two years of strategy in capital markets.


According to the article only one lone voice is out there right now speaking against these proposed changes. Harvey J. Goldschmid, a professor at Columbia Law School:

It would. . . dramatically diminish the effectiveness of the S.E.C., of criminal enforcement, of state attorney general enforcement and of private damage actions,”

“The recent drive for accountability and deterrence would be replaced by a world in which almost anything goes,”


All very scary stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC