You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #71: OK, I getcha now. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. OK, I getcha now.
You appear to be right, that BradBlog is not specifically involved with the "reward" offer.

We could consider the possibility that there is a chance that Kimberlin could be "entirely innocent", or even if not, that he had "turned over a new leaf".

But while a convicted criminal might be offered a "second chance", Kimberlin was convicted of purjury regarding drugs in 1974, convicted of drug dealing and bombings in 1980, violations of parole (drug charges) in 1997, and last released in 2001. Second, third and fourth "chances", and he apparently doesn't currently even admit that he was even tried, let alone convicted, let alone guilty, let alone remorseful.

From his band's site: "Without any trial..." Uhm, we have the name of the federal prosecutor, the federal judge, Kimberlin's reference to the polygraph expert who had been hired by his own lawyer at his trial, tons of links.

After three federal trials, Kimberlin was found guilty in 1981 and sentenced to 50 years in prison. In a 1983 court decision upheld by the Indiana Supreme Court, Kimberlin was ordered to pay $ 1.6 million to the family of Carl DeLong. Brett Kimberlin pleaded guilty to separate federal drug charges in 1997. This was a violation of his parole and he was placed in jail again. http://www.prospectresearch.org/pages/samples/cprwebsamplekimberlinprofile703.pdf


I do wish Brad was "sorting out the facts", as I agree, "I would not stake a movement's reputation on it", but here we are.

A multiply convicted bomber/drug dealer/purjurer, apparent "gifted liar" should cause concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC