Reply #79: Exactly. See marie's post above.

[Maven]

This is the same strategy that marie identified upthread of putting two ideas together that are unrelated and letting people draw the conclusion you want without actually saying it.

Likewise, look at this:

That leaves the most important question: If our sources maintain that a grand jury has returned an indictment - and we have pointed to a criminal case number that we are told corresponds to it - then how is it possible that Patrick Fitzgerald is reported to have said that 'he does not anticipate seeking charges against Rove at this time?'

Now they're claiming out of the blue that they were "told" that the case number they came up with corresponds to an indictment? By whom? Marc Ash's mommy?

This is more insulting gibberish to save their asses, and now I think the comparison to "Shattered Glass" is really apt.