CNN reports that Karl Rove has just finished his testimony before in the grand jury after four hours in his fifth time to the Grandy jury. John King reports that Rove's camp the grand jury just has as few loose ends to rap up to clear his name. However, other legal experts support the Jason Leopold version that Luskin is now convinced this was their last chance to avoid indictment. Possible Explanation of Target Letter Dispute?
I am wondering if the explanation of this apparently contradictory information is that Rove's lawyer Luskin may have received the letter identifying Rove as a target as reported by Leopold, but Luskin negotiated a suspension, or delay in that designated target status pending this voluntary grand jury testimony. So Luskin's press release that Rove is not now a designated target doesn't necessarily mean that they did recieve a target letter. Could it mean that the target designation is "in abeyence." Jack Cafferty
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/26/155950/922