Reply #15: Depends on the fraud

[sandnsea]

If we'd laid out a nice little case regarding machine placement, lines, irregular provisional ballot counting, etc.; we might have had a case for fraud. But nothing that could point to Bush, unless we could have subpoenaed Blackwell's emails or something. Now that we've got the Triad tech and recount cheat sheets, that could have really added to that narrow case.

But the machine hacking, we've got no evidence there and that's where they started. The statistical analysis stuff proving machine hacking and a stolen election. It was a stupid approach. We should have started with just the glitches all over the country and built that part of the case from there. To get better elections in the future, not claim fraud in this election.

Now, I'm afraid, we're going to have nothing because every time these same people try to get changes made in the future, the Republicans can just point to the 300 votes in Ohio and laugh. It's all been thrown into together, the waters have been muddied, and I don't know if we'll ever get things clear enough in people's minds to get them behind the changes that have got to happen. I am seriously very frustrated by the whole thing.