You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Alchemy is different. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Alchemy is different.
What happened to alchemy was that it slowly transformed itself into modern chemistry. There is no such continuity for astrology. In the early seventeenth century, there was general dissatisfaction with astrology and an attempt to purify it, i.e., to extract what was worthwhile and throw away the rest. Such attempts failed.

Isaac Newton wore many hats. He was an alchemist, a unitarian interested in biblical chronology, and master of the London Mint, as well as what we would now call a mathematician and physicist. But he had the good sense to avoid astrology.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC