You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Neither Political Party Immune to Big Pharma Dollars [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Neither Political Party Immune to Big Pharma Dollars
When short on facts, or losing an argument - call people names like luddite.

I am used to it, I've been called a Luddite for opposing paperless electronic voting machines too.

IT is wise IMHO to excercize caution about a new vaccine which may harm far more people than it may ever help.

Merck and its front groups have funded an enormous lobbying heavy with appeals to fear and guilt.

Neither political party is immune to big pharma dollars:


Big Pharma has few rivals along the Potomac when it comes to raw influence. Much of that power comes from the drug industry's vital role as a source of campaign contributions and lobbying money. Between 1998 and 2006, drug companies spent more than any other industry cajoling and wining and dining politicians and their staffers. All told, they shelled out over $1 billion during the eight-year period, more than any other U.S. industry, according to Washington watchdog group, the Center for Responsive Politics. And in the most recent election, Big Pharma was among the top industries, contributing $17.8 million to political candidates and political action committees. Some 68 percent of contributions went to Republicans; 31 percent to Democrats.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/06/news/economy/pluggedin_...


I question the rush to push this vaccine onto little girls so quickly.

I question the process to examine it for safety.

I question the effectiveness of this vaccine.

I question its value compared to the millions that could definitely be used to
save 10 - 100 times more lives.

This vaccine, if it never harmed anyone (Merck admits to unexplained deaths) would save
about 200 lives in my state.

That same amount of money spent could save thousands of lives in my state.

I would rather see schools provide sex education and provide free health clinic services to girls and boys than rush into this thing with our eyes and ears closed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC