Reply #59: i agree...

[c-macdonald]

the numbers TIA presents do look like a comprehensive cause for invesigation of fraud. But my problem is the accuracy of the data, not with his analysis. These numbers look very suspicious to me and I have some questions before I'll accept his work as accurate:

1) Where did you get the exit poll data from?
2) How did you calculate the MOE and Standard Deviation?
3) What considerations did you give to the un-randomness of the data?

Answering these questions will go a long way towards legitimizing his work.