You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #1: No matter what system, elections are only as trustworthy as the poll workers administering them. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-10 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. No matter what system, elections are only as trustworthy as the poll workers administering them.
Edited on Mon Aug-23-10 03:25 AM by LAGC
Last time I was working as a poll worker at a local precinct during the Idaho May primaries, we spent a good portion of our idle-time pondering just how "easy" it would be for unethical poll workers to commit election fraud by stuffing the ballot boxes and faking signatures of registered voters. Since the ballots are anonymous, there's no way to verify which ones belongs to whom, and even if you had some way of doing so, presumably those who didn't bother to vote wouldn't check to notice their name being used. All you would need is just four like-minded poll workers who agreed on politics (and who weren't afraid of the potential legal consequences if they were caught!) to conspire to game the system. Really, it was quite scary when we thought about it. For while we were all ethical and trustworthy, it wouldn't be hard to imagine four determined conspirators managing to get assigned to the same precinct together. Really, to help minimize the potential for abuse, I think all poll workers should have to be chosen at random from the population just like they are for jury duty, instead of how it works now: an all-volunteer force that leaves itself more vulnerable to such a conspiracy and potential fraud being perpetrated.

But even with an electronic/Internet voting scheme at polling places, you'd still have this problem. A few unethical poll workers could really go hogwild submitting dozens of electronic ballots, potentially changing the outcome of a race. The only way anyone would know is if "voter turnout" was unexpectedly higher at certain precincts, but that's not proof, just suspicion. As it is now, we just have to hope that the fear of someone with loose lips bragging about it or informing on the other conspirators would be enough to keep people honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC