You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #21: Quick reason why (IMO) and then I have to go to sleep... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Quick reason why (IMO) and then I have to go to sleep...

You are right there was no final ruling; judge just refused to provide the injunction and said that case was unlikely to succeed on the merits. The plaintiffs withdrew and IMO it was so as not to set a precedent for future cases when they could see the judge was against them.

Yes we are still working to get the DREs replaced. Not easy.

BTW, PA already has a *cough* audit law... it has been on the books for many years since way before HAVA. It's 2% or 2000 votes whichever is LESS. Really means a lot; especially in counties with paperless DREs. (lol)

Good night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC