You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #86: nope [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. nope
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 02:32 PM by OnTheOtherHand
Look, if there is one* of these arguments that you want to discuss, go for it. The FAQ already substantially incorporates TIA's initial attempt to respond; I could copy and paste as much as the DU interface can accommodate, but there would be no point. TIA's mere ability to string words and tables together doesn't constitute a rebuttal.

* Why one? Because, in your other response, you haven't even managed to respond to my single question on a single topic, so I see no point in trying (or pretending) to discuss several simultaneously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC