You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #19: Largely what OTOH said. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Largely what OTOH said.
That, and chill out. It ain't personal. If it was I'd say I didn't like his eyeglasses or somethin'.

And no, I didn't argue that OpScan is more vulnerable. It's merely just as hackable as DREs. Though some reports will say it's in fact the other way around.

Spare me the "paper can be recounted" argument. We know they can...and aren't.

And yes, I'm sorry Bo wasn't more about defending levers like the the state BOE, in effect, has been doing, or pushing as hard for a real audit to go along with those wholesale hackable "Accuvotes" he promotes.

Oh. And one more thing. Welcome to DU. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC