Reply #133: Stewart is the one being debunked....

[BeFree]

.... by showing his bias and that fact that he's a champion of e-voting. So looking at his paper, with the foreknowledge of his bias, one can see where he twists things around to make it seem the machines had no bearing on how the votes were counted.

Why do some claim to be against the machines, yet link to papers containing machine supporting arguments, support articles supporting use of the machines and argue against arguments describing the machines as election altering?

It is a black or white issue.

Knowing that the machines are easily alterable, and knowing that there are powerful people who will use the machines to alter votes, it is unconceivable to me how anyone who claims to want machines taken out would want to support machine supporting characters like Stewart.