You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

"It's far easier to manipulate paper ballots than encrypted memory cards" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 10:20 AM
Original message
"It's far easier to manipulate paper ballots than encrypted memory cards"
Advertisements [?]
anyone want to take this on?

Send letters to Send letters to
Machine politics
Originally published March 14, 2006

Three months ago, a Finnish computer expert successfully hacked into an optical scan voting machine in Florida. Now, Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. and members of the House of Delegates seem to believe this same technology is a far better choice for the coming election than the state's touch-screen voting system. Why? That's a good question. Because while there are legitimate security challenges posed by touch-screen machines, including the absence of a so-called paper trail, these shortcomings pale compared with the problems spawned by this 11th-hour push to replace them with optical scan machines.

Even the most skeptical Luddite understands that it's far easier to manipulate paper ballots than encrypted memory cards. And optical scan machines have already proved to be less reliable - misreading poorly marked ballots, for instance - than the extensively tested $90 million system the state has put in place.

This is no time to throw out the proverbial baby with the bathwater. The hysteria over touch-screen voting has been fueled by Republicans who think crying voter fraud helps them politically and Democrats taking marching orders from Montgomery County Del. Sheila E. Hixson, chairwoman of the influential House Ways and Means Committee. To even think about converting to optical scan equipment just six months before the primary is a recipe for disaster.

It's up the Senate to take a more levelheaded approach. Diebold Election System's offer to replace some of Maryland's voting machines with printer-equipped versions to evaluate their performance might prove helpful. Certainly, it makes more sense than spending $12 million or more for a less-accurate, less-secure, and less-accessible way to cast a ballot this fall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC