You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Think of it as tactics, rather than strategy [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Think of it as tactics, rather than strategy
Edited on Fri Jan-20-06 10:26 PM by riqster
In 2004, there was no way to conduct a massive, centralized, completely orchestrated theft. The technology was too diverse, the opposition was on the lookout, and the election workers insufficiently coooperative.

Instead, what was done was opportunistic, targeted fraud, utilizing weak spots and Reep loyalists, in the public and private sectors. I will speak from my experience in Ohio, and suggest you then adopt this approach in researching other states.

Cuyahoga County; DEEP Blue, with a Reep BOE boss (Michael Vu). They decided to switch to Diebold's voter registration system late in the election cycle, and never did get all of the new registrations entered. For this and other reasons,they had an unknown number of lost registrations. (Victoria Lovegren has done quite a bit of research on this matter, and IIRC it was discussed on DU a while back.) This had the effect of disenfranchising a predominantly Dem voter group, because a voter whose registration is suspect is made to vote a provisional ballot; these votes were, in the main, NEVER COUNTED in Ohio, and in Cuyahoga County there were a number of shady dealings in re eligibility. (Two BOE workers were indicted for activities relating to the performance of their duties). If you can't even get to cast your ballot, who needs to tamper with a tabulator? And who can prove fraud? FWIW, MY ballot was never counted due to a voter registration data issue in another county.

Warren County: Solid red, shut their tabulation room off in response to a bogus terror threat. No way of knowing what really happened there, to this day.

Franklin County-purple county, mostly dem but a Reep-controlled BOE. MANY problems with machine availabilty in Dem districts, none in Reep districts. Oooops, they said. Honest mistake. Uh-huh...

Stark County-Reep controlled BOE, Blue county. Went for Kerry, but funny, not by QUITE as much as you'd think...

Essentially, this was the pattern. Boost some red county Bush totals a bit, suppress some blue county Kerry totals a bit, have the Reep SOS suppress Dem voter turnout while enabling Reep voter turnout, and voila. Nothing massive required, and damned hard to prove in court. Also won't result in more than a few points' difference in exit poll numbers, because Ohio was a divided state; but, as in 2000, one divided state with a Reep government was all they needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC