Reply #2: FYI, Some slight edits have been made to it today

[sunshinekathy]

So, please pick it up again if you picked it up earlier this a.m.

http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit-Poll-Analysis.pdf

1. Some one reading it noticed a couple of typos in the appendix which derived the formula, and

2. I noticed an error in numbers in the Ohio example 1, and

3. I've been replacing the charts with charts that are formatted to be more easily read, and that is a time-consuming process (I've still got six to go).

Now, if only the availability of this method of analyzing exit poll discrepancies would prompt:

1. the National Election Pool and Edison/Mitofsky to publicly release the data needed for analyzing discrepancies (in time for candidates to use it for wiser decision-making), or

2. some fundraising to be done to conduct public exit polling prior to 2006, which someone like Zogby or Dan Jones or ?? could be hired to help with and a couple of election activists groups I know would be willing to help organize volunteer pollworkers to accomplish.