Reply #74: just more of the same

[Neil B Forzod]

Your post is once again full of distorted inventions

No it isn't.

...and your posts should be removed from DU IMO.

Because they disagree with yours?

Sometimes we must change our opinions to reflect the truth.

Yes, try that.

Stop being a bully and be a little bit open minded to learning new facts.

OK. Post an actual fact and I'll keep an open mind. Your opinion that ES&S is a "good company" and has "the best voting systems available on the market" and has "a really good optical scan system" and etc. doesn't constitute fact.

Seriously. You spoke to an ES&S guy and he told you their system is great?

Breaking news! I just called up Ken Clark at Diebold and he told me their system is way better. Do you see how silly you sound?

Keep in mind also that you may be new to this issue and that others may have studied computer science and mathematics and voting systems for years, and so be able to inform you.

With all due respect, Kathy, I suspect that I have quite a bit more knowledge and experience about the election industry and voting systems than most people here, including you. Which you can believe or disbelieve, it doesn't matter either way to me. *shrug* How about you keep in mind that some people may have years of actual hands-on experience and information that you couldn't possibly have, and I'll keep in mind that some others may have studied computer science and mathematics. Deal?


Neil