You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #92: The Oracle caught a psychic type plus an opportunity for agreement. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. The Oracle caught a psychic type plus an opportunity for agreement.
Line above which reads:
"1- 15% OF GORE VOTERS (3 MILLION) VOTED FOR BUSH"
should have read
"I= 15% OF GORE VOTERS (7.5 MILLION) VOTED FOR BUSH"
The Oracle apologizes to Sensei for his mistake. Will do 50 push ups.

I was there at 21 and got a message: "In 2004 you will be stunned and sickened; in 2005 you will awaken and see the light." What a a coincidence.

Let me add to your list:
"Voter suppression, including rationing of voting machines in Democratic precincts
Differential spoilage of Democratic votes in precincts where it has always happened (also rejected provisional Democratic ballots)
Spoilage of votes in largely Democratic precincts
A limited amount of vote flipping (but it has to be limited to avoid producing the swing-shift correlation)."
Padded Republican voter registration in select precincts (e.g. SW Ohio).
Padded Republican totals during tabulation in Ohio.
Padded Republican totals during tabulation in select localities (e.g. south Florida and heavily heavily Democratic states (e.g., CA & NY).

Tabulation in 2004 should not be left out as a huge potential source of fraud. Unlike voting machines in 2004, Diebold had deep penetration in the tabulation market. Who is Jeff Dean is not a rhetorical question.

Here is a point that cries out for simple reason.

The Columbus Dispatch runs polls which are highly respected and have been very accurate. The ran one just a few days prior to the special issues election in 11/05. Their predictions for the vote were so far off it's stunning. For issues 2 & 3, there's a completely unbelievable swing of 40-50% from the poll compared to the vote totals. This isn't a 3-5 point spread which is worthy enough of debate to involve a lot of bright people in the task. It's a clear case of either total incompetence on the part of the Dispatch OR election fraud. I think it was a Blackwell "throw down" to see if the Democrats would take it as a prelude to fixing the 2006 elections there and elsewhere. Of note 44 Ohio counties installed Diebold voting machines prior to this vote.

What do you say about that? Some apologize for this which I find amazing. What's more amazing is the total cave in. What the heck is going on here.

Here are the #'s:


Issue 2: Vote by mail.
Poll YES 59% | NO 33%
Rslt YES 36% | NO 63%


Issue 3: Limit campaign contributions.
Poll YES 61% | NO 25%
Rslt YES 33% | NO 67%



Boss Tweed and Secretary Blackwell: Fond admiration

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC