You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #229: You say: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Febble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #223
229. You say:
"I just wish that if someone is going to do a study on one vague area of e-voting, they explain specifically what the study is out to address rather than lump it together and call it a comprehensive study."

Who called it a comprehensive study? And what is vague about the title:

"The Wrong Man is President! Overvotes in the 2000 Presidential Election
in Florida".

Headline grabber (nice!) followed by a very specific indication as to what the paper is about.

And if you think most science ventures can "get team of at least 100 people" to address a question, you are certainly an optimist. This was a good piece of work. Don't knock if for not answering the question you wanted it to answer. It tells you the question it addressed, and tells you the answer. Nothing vague about it at all.

The reason for the precinct-tabulated optical scanner comparison was presumably to give a practical baseline. So the conclusion was not "if there had been no overvotes, Gore would have won" but "if the overvotes had been no worse than in precinct-tabulated optical scanners Gore would have won". In other words, even within the realms of available technology, over-votes could have been reduced to a level at which Gore would have won.

Nowhere in the paper does Mebane argue for insecure systems. That is a separate issue, addressed by others. And as far as I know, no-one has ever claimed that this study was a comprehensive study of electoral problems in Florida in 2000. Try this paper for references to more studies of Florida 2000 (including one by Mebane and others on the butterfly ballot).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC