You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #198: slight puzzlement [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #193
198. slight puzzlement
You invite me to this task by asserting that I am way over-thinking, and then propose ten rules of which one is to "keep it really simple"? Hmm. Probably I am in one of my hyper-literal moods.

I'm not quite sure where the "simple" starting place is here, but I can try to "play" it your way.

On point 4, I wonder whether you are seeing more wobble in my statements than I do. I would be comfortable assuming no difference in turnout between returning Bush2K and Gore2K voters, unless otherwise convinced. That being the case, I expect the retrospective question to yield more (reported) Bush2K voters, and a six-point gap seems fine. (I would have to download all the other exit polls to refine that, which I will not do any time soon.)

On point 5, I can't concede that rule if I don't know what it means. If you mean that I shouldn't spin the crazy idea that Gore2K voters would become Bush2K voters, I can't accept, because in the NES 2000-2004 panel study, some demonstrably did -- confirming my expectation from other panel and cross-section studies.

On point 6, ditto. TIA asked the reasonable question (only I think he thought it was rhetorical), whazzup with that 43/37 split? I think false recall is the obvious answer.

I think your point 9 is well put.

I'm fine with point 10. I thought the debate was whether the official vote count plausibly _could_ be right, not whether it _had to_ be right. And obviously people's criteria of plausibility vary, as per your point 9.

Nu?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC