You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #167: I agree. This is a bipartisan issue. Specifically... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #162
167. I agree. This is a bipartisan issue. Specifically...
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 12:37 AM by autorank
The machines, the software, the vendors, the networking, the lack of security, the lack of real certification, the personnel, the arrogance of bureaucracy, the docile public, the cynical, sleeping CM (corporate media)...all of these make a mockery of democracy. I've never said corruption is exclusively the province of the Republicans, although it certainly seems that they're the big winners: Congress, the presidency (twice).

There should be nothing controversial about Voting Rights. The reason the act passed 40 years ago was simple: no one could mount an argument against a person's right to vote. This time around, the voting rights movement has to establish fraud in order to make the connection between the right to vote and the problems with the current system.

Interestingly, there has been a voting rights issue with election procedures for decades called "spoiled ballots" which routinely make up 1-2% of the presidential ballot. These types of disqualifications take place 7 times as often in minority precincts, typically black precincts. We all tolerated this as though it were a fact of life but, in fact, it was blatant racism operating to steal the votes of a specific segment of the population.

Part of the answer to your question about the excellent summary in Answers.Com is "go along to get along." If any established part leader stands up and says, "It's a sham," they will threaten to topple the whole system because "it's not legitimate" follows closely after the first statement.

I say, let's put it all on the table, go back to paper as the only solution, and make appropriate accommodations for handicapped voters with our 'voting machine surplus.' Simple isn't it. Paper, trail of evidence, observed counting, recounts are possible, precincts announce the results so no temptation to mess with network transmissions.

That would be easy and it would solve the problem.

Why don't you think a major political figure from either party has said a word?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC