You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #164: Okay Febble, Thanks for your articulate response.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #134
164. Okay Febble, Thanks for your articulate response..
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 11:55 PM by Melissa G
Is this possibly a case of blind folks describing an elephant?

Here is my thinking. Your group is looking at the tail and we are looking at the trunk or vice versa if you will, but I am slightly colored by my perspective (grin) We will all in this group admit the enormous elephant of an unfair unverifiable election fraught with problems... The framing of the question then diverges.

In my group here in this forum and other places as well there was the question of were the Blivet votes came from when Dems did an unmatched effort of new voter registrations and motivated base turnout. This was unequaled on the repub side. We frame our analysis from this question. Your group doubts the validity of our approach.

Your approach, and I am being purposefully very vague here, centers around technicalities about polling noise and polling process. There are other threads where i have gone into detail on why i have my doubts about this approach but i am being general here and am just responding to concept. (No personal disrespect to you or OTOH but note my reference to the anatomical reference of what part of the elephant I ascribe this question to. grinning here)

Since it does not really answer the part of the elephant I am looking at, I think your question is more useless than you do. This in no way means I am right merely that I am more interested in my question than yours, which I generally understand as questions that speak to the technicalities of the polling process. Your group's work might give us valid information about process but it does not IMHO really do much to explain what is interesting to me about the enormous unexplainable vote shift. I find the heavily re weighted republican pre election poll defense unmoving and very weak as a supportive argument of the alleged shrub victory which is a rationale which has been posited as reason for the blivet win elsewhere..
Neither question is complete. They are tiny parts of a big elephant.

Bill bored has another leg of the elephant, Tabulators and election management systems. He thinks we election poll watchers are noisy too...
edit clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC