You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #149: Once again, an exercise in futility on your part. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #148
149. Once again, an exercise in futility on your part.
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 12:25 PM by TruthIsAll
You did not look at the three detailed breakeven calcs.

The breakeven is 49.83%.
This has been derived by formula.
The formula contains two independent variables, X1 and X2

We input a value for X2 to derive the value for X1 which satisfies the breakeven.

And yes, we ignore Nader.

Once again, your convoluted logic and lack of understanding has been exposed for all DUers.

You would not be able to design an analytical model if your life depended on it.

Stop flagellating.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC