You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #130: Ooops... I meant [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
anaxarchos Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #111
130. Ooops... I meant
you chose Gore 2000 voters, of course.

So since I can't edit the above, let me restate the question:

If you stipulate that Gore2K and Bush2K voters were roughly equal in turnout and that those that voted for others in 2000 and those that didn't vote broke roughly in the way indicated by the NEP... then:

Exactly how much red shift among Gore 2000 voters was needed (using any assumptions you like) in order to give Bush his plurality?

AND

Where is the empirical evidence (pre-election/post-election polls, etc.) that supports such a previously undetected red-shift among those who voted for Gore in 2000?

Simple question....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC