You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #73: Refusal of open release questions credibility; selective release implies [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. Refusal of open release questions credibility; selective release implies
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 10:09 PM by autorank
collusion. Sorry, those are the facts. If you have nothing to hide, talk, open up, release the data. The election process belongs to the public, not you or Mitofsky or the venal network consortium. There are real questions that abound. Release the data and allow precincts to be identified. Let's see what happens. It is so painful to hear you ask us to prove the data would be useful when the data is not available. This is just awful reasoning, stunningly so.

Releasing things to ESI and febble, selectively, is an outrage. Who are they? Why should they be the arbiters of the most important decision of the new century? A broad release diminishes questions, selective releases, well... Your logic is painfully inadequate. It's reminiscent of the selective release of the Dead Sea Scrolls -- we know what that's about, conformity with the prevailing views of the holders of the data, in both cases.

Release the data is the appropriate position. You can't lose, if you really want to settle the issue. If it proves fraud, you win because that's new data. If it doesn't or is inclusive, you win again. But to say the following is making about you: "I am perplexed and troubled by the apparently widespread conviction that Mitofsky believes he has in his possession information that could save democracy, and/or that full release of the data would provide some huge advance in our ability to assess fraud" . The American public has a right to the data, regardless of you being "troubled."

Release the data to everybody, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC