You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #24: Are these the same intelligent people.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Are these the same intelligent people..
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 02:25 PM by TruthIsAll
If you mean that I am assuming that 43% of 2004 voters _actually_ voted for Bush in 2000, and only 37% _actually_ voted for Gore in 2000 -- no, I neither assume nor believe that. I don't know anyone who does. (And so you might stop to wonder: how can anyone see that figure and not think the election was stolen? But you should ask the question seriously, not rhetorically, because many intelligent people who have seen the figure do not think the election was stolen.)


Are these the same "intelligent" people who believe that

- Bush legitimately won the 2000 election in Florida?
- the Repubs legitimately won the senate in 2002?
- Bush won Ohio without the help of Ken Blackwell?
- Bush won Florida without the help of Jeb Bush?
- The reason why Diebold/Es&S didn't include a voter-verified ballot was to save cost?
- All those new, young female voters wanted Bush?
- The reason why the early exit poll results were never mentioned in the media was because they had no meaning?
- The reason that the Final Exit Poll matched to the vote count was because the vote count is accurate?
- Mitofsky is a great exit pollster with 25 years of experience who only hired inexperienced polltakers when a Bush was running?
- The exit polls were uniformly biased throughout the states to favor Kerry?
- that it's just a coincidence that the exit polls were accurate, (according to Mitofsky's own data) in those districts where paper ballots were used?
- that Republicans who controlled the design, manufacturing and programming of the voting machines fought against a paper trail and with machines that could never pass certification?
- who give you talking points?

You mean those people?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC