You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: I don't object to the fact that he uses assumptions [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't object to the fact that he uses assumptions
I object to the analytical incoherence of the argument.

If we assume that all the NEP statistics are true, then there is no internal contradiction (barring an undemonstrated calculation error).

I tried to reconstruct the assumptions that TIA actually used in his analysis, and couldn't. So I cannot know specifically which of those assumptions vary from NEP's.

TIA's results are only as good as his assumptions, and if we can't even identify the assumptions -- much less consider whether they are better or worse than NEP's -- then we are nowhere.

I get the impression from your post that TIA has evoked the appearance of an internal contradiction in the NEP figures that (as far as I can tell, and as the rest of my post attempted to illustrate) doesn't actually exist.

I assume that some of NEP's assumptions are indeed measurably wrong. It is my impression that the way in which they have weighted to the official returns will distort some of the crosstabs. Unfortunately, even if I am right, it doesn't shed any light on why the unweighted results differ from the official returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC