You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: With all due respect, please read my paper [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Bruce ODell Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. With all due respect, please read my paper
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 07:17 PM by Bruce ODell
If you actually had, you would have encountered these words:

"...a closer look at the data cite in their report reveals that Kerry and Bush supporter exit poll response rates actually did not vary significantly by precinct partisanship . Systematic exit poll bias cannot be ruled out as an explanation of the 2004 Presidential exit poll discrepancy – nor can widespread vote count corruption . The case for fraud is still unproven, and I believe will never be able to be proven through exit poll analysis alone.

" This paper should not be misinterpreted as an argument against the likelihood of vote fraud. Quite the opposite; I believe US voting equipment and vote counting processes are severely vulnerable to systematic insider manipulation and that is a clear and present danger to our democracy . I strongly endorse the Working Paper’s call to implement Voter-Verifiable Paper Ballots and a secure audit protocol, and to compile and analyze a database of election results."

Perhaps it's old fashioned of me, but working as I do in an engineering profession, truth actually is more than just a peripheral concern.

When the question at hand is: "am I still a citizen of the American Republic, or am I just a serf of the American Empire", I for one strongly believe that getting the answer wrong - either way - is a Really Bad Thing. Don't you?

Has it occurred to you (as I also stated in my paper) that "It is possible to speculate that if a hypothetical group or groups actually have the power to covertly shift votes on a national scale sufficient to change the election outcome, they doubtless would be extremely careful to try to avoid detection – especially, one would think, by angry statisticians."

I'm so concerned that the election may have been stolen, I'm actually trying to find the evidence. If you've found the evidence, show me. If you haven't, either join me in analyzing the data - if you can - or stop questioning my integrity, simply for insisting on analyzing it properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC