Reply #74: Let me educate you with the facts..

[TruthIsAll]

OTOH, I'm surprised at you.

You are apparently innocent of the FACT that they had to change BOTH weights AND percentages in a number of categories TO MATCH THE CORRUPTED VOTE COUNT. Voted in 2000 is the MOST outrageous example. There are many others.

And where the WEIGHTS were NOT changed, the percentages were- TO THE POINT OF ABSURDITY. KERRY WENT FROM 54% OF FEMALES AT 12:22AM TO 51% AT 1:25PM? DO YOU REALLY EXPECT US TO BELIEVE THAT?

ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE WAS A MASSIVE TURNOUT OF NEW, YOUNG, FEMALE VOTERS WHO WERE SCARED THAT ROE V. WADE WOULD BE IN JEOPARDY IF BUSH WERE RE-SELECTED?

I refer you to the TIMELINE:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x363938

BTW, you did not anwser my question on the 43/37 IMPOSSIBILITY.

It shows that you are ALSO unaware or dismissive of the FACT that it can be NO HIGHER than 39.8% MAXIMUM, which is itself implausible since it assumes 100% Bush 2000 voter turnout.

Do you know why that statement is a fact?
Do you want me to prove it to you mathematically?

I will save that for a future lesson.

OTOH, your credibiity is not the only thing in question.
So is your knowledge of the facts.