You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #60: You have just proven to DU why this "reconciliation" project is bogus [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. You have just proven to DU why this "reconciliation" project is bogus
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 06:38 AM by TruthIsAll
You say:
Now if you can show me where I am wrong on the spatial distribution of these events, and show that it does have a bearing on stealing the popular vote, then you are on to something. Otherwise it further cements the position I have staked out since December, that the fraud was specific to battleground states, and its full intent was voter suppression that did not require computers. Evidence that we have had for months.

I say:
"The full intent was voter suppression that did not require computers"? That's bunk. Pure and simple.

Plus, the fraud was NOT limited to battleground states.
And vote switching WAS done by computers.

mgr, you speak in tongues. On the one hand, you now claim to believe fraud cost Kerry the election. This is after you and your partner, the data "re-conciliator", have maligned my analysis with ad hominems all these months.

Now you implicitly confirm the analysis was correct - by saying the election was stolen..

Now you and foo-bar decide to join in with analysis of real data. Forgive me if I am suspicious of your intentions. The impetus for this was the 86 of 88 voting machine switches probability thread, which foo-bar obviously felt he had to respond to - under the guise of further analysis. I can't wait to see the result of this "reconciliation" project.

A prediction: It will NOT come to the obvious conclusion that the voting machines were programmed to switch votes. On the contrary, it will attempt to fog that evidence as well. The proof: You have already stated your intent in the first paragraph of this thread.

That makes the foo-bar "study" irrelevant from the get-go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC