"they freely acknowledged that they arbitrarily altered their findings to make the exit polls look like the votes." Well now, why would the media want them to do this? I mean, seriously, isn't this a bit odd. A more accurate statement would be "look like the <Bush> votes" (Bush votes in the proprietary sense). Wouldn't their integrity suffer from poor boundaries between the polling task and whatever the alternative is that incorporates distorting the polling task. There are no independent entities that can do this because they all either cater to corporate clients (either as an organization or individuals) or corporate funding sources. These NEPs are probablyi the last we will have to use to prove fraud. Hop on board and think outside the box...you come up with a theory that supports the NEPs conclusion that Kerry won. Afterall, that's what happened.
On Edit: N.B. Here's a chance to do something and learn at the same time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x368296:hi:
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
