You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: EXPLANATION OF THE WEIGHTINGS AND RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. EXPLANATION OF THE WEIGHTINGS AND RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
Edited on Sun May-08-05 02:23 PM by TruthIsAll
EXPLANATION OF THE WEIGHTINGS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS

As I have posted numerous times on DU, the absolute maximum possible weightings in the How Voted 2000 category are as follows:

Bush: 39.82%, Gore 40.25%, Other (Nader): 2.62%.

FORGET ABOUT THE POLLING WEIGHTS. THESE ARE THE ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE WEIGHTS BASED ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF 2000 VOTERS WHO WERE STILL ALIVE AND COULD COME TO VOTE IN 2004.

FOR THIS ANALYSIS, WE SHALL ASSUME THAT ALL OF THEM (GORE, BUSH AND NADER VOTERS) CAME TO VOTE. WE KNOW THAT SOME DID NOT VOTE IN 2004, THEREFORE THE ACTUAL WEIGHTS ARE SLIGHTLY LOWER FOR GORE, BUSH AND NADER.

TO THE EXTENT THAT GORE, BUSH AND NADER VOTERS STAYED HOME, THE CORRESPONDING PERCENTAGE WEIGHTINGS MUST DECLINE AND THE PERCENTAGE OF NEW VOTERS (WHO WENT STRONGLY FOR KERRY) MUST RISE.

I WELCOME ANYONE WHO CARES TO DISPUTE THESE FACTS TO STEP FORWARD AND DO SO.

Since the Final 13660 respondent timeline (which Bush won) is rejected due to the IMPOSSIBLE 43% Bush /37% Gore weighting, we will use the 13047 timeline as our base. We will assume the 13047 timeline voting percentages as a base case, along with the maximum weightings given above (100% turnout for Gore and Bush voters).

We will calculate vote totals using one percent increments applied to the base case vote percentages for each subgroup: New voters, Gore, Bush and Nader/Other.

In the base case (rBr factor =0%), Kerry wins 51.94% of the vote, a 5.91mm margin.

If we assume a 7% decrease in the Kerry vote in each subgroup and apply the difference to the Bush vote for each group, we find that Bush wins the election with 50.74%, a 2.98 million vote margin (very close to the actual recorded vote). But for Bush to win by a 3 million vote margin 14.37% of Gore voters must have voted for him, as well as 44.99% of New voters, 91.63% of Bush 2000 voters and 25.97% of Nader voters. These percentages are totally implausible and far beyond the 1.75% margin of error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC