You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: "master plan or just a master suggestion?" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. "master plan or just a master suggestion?"
Edited on Tue Apr-26-05 11:19 AM by tommcintyre
Well.. that's part of the puzzle. Was it mainly a small group doing a lot of damage (master plan), or a lot on "minions" doing things here and there that would favor Bush (master suggestion). No doubt, there was a mixture of both. So it was a "death of a thousand cuts". But which one(s) were most lethal (fatal)? Which argument(s) (of HOW the fatal blow(s) were most likely delivered) are most soundly based in fact (most plausible)?

We can speculate here in this forum 'til the cows come home - and there is a certain value in that. But, I'm hoping someone with "the credentials" (like a David Dill, etc.) has (or will soon) stick their neck out and propose a theory of what was done that delivered the fatal blow(s). But most importantly, theorize HOW it was accomplished.

This certainly isn't easy for many reasons, but with ALL the evidence we now have collected, I think it's time it was unified as much as possible to show the most plausible "big picture" possible of how it was accomplished. As I said previously, this should be the job of a serious MAJOR commission; but I'm not going to count on that happening.

If the evidence was tied together in the most credible/plausible manner, it could only help to convince more people. Like berniew1 said above, it shouldn't be necessary, but that seems to be the way it is.

EDIT:
The "freeper factor": First, no worries, they probably wouldn't believe the election was stolen even if Moses came back and delivered the news on a new set of tablets. ;) (Look what the say about the USV report, for example.)

And besides, always remember, we don't have to PROVE anything. All we need to do is create legitimate "reasonable doubt" that Bush really won. They are most afraid of this. Look how they keep talking about restoring and maintaining the confidence of the public in the election system. Of course, they'd rather continue with the "illusion" of a fair system; but our job can be accomplished just by creating legitimate doubt in that same "faux" system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC