Reply #31: I agree with the spirit of your post. It's really just semantics, emphasis

[TruthIsAll]

I am a passionate believer in the truth.
I will never say anything which I cannot back up with facts.
My thread titles are meant to attract.
Yet they are factual.

I never exaggerate the probabilities.
If I claim it's 1 in 300 trillion, it's because that's what the function returned.

I never use data or calculations which cannot be verified. I clearly display the assumptions, formulas and methodology.

Finally I projected Kerry the 2-party vote winner by 51.8%-48.2% in my election model (337 EV) using published pre-election state and national polls with a 99.5% probability.

I was damn close to being right on the money.
http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/